-
Audit approach overview
Our audit approach will allow our client's accounting personnel to make the maximum contribution to…
-
Annual and short period audit
At P&A Grant Thornton, we provide annual and short period financial statement audit services that go…
-
Review engagement
A review involves limited investigation with a narrower scope than an audit, and is undertaken…
-
Other Related Services
We make it a point to keep our clients abreast of the developments and updates relating to the…
-
Tax advisory
With our knowledge of tax laws and audit procedures, we help safeguard the substantive and procedural…
-
Tax compliance
We aim to minimize the impact of taxation, enabling you to maximize your potential savings and to…
-
Corporate services
For clients that want to do business in the Philippines, we assist in determining the appropriate and…
-
Tax education and advocacy
Our advocacy work focuses on clarifying the interpretation of laws and regulations, suggesting…
-
Business risk services
Our business risk services cover a wide range of solutions that assist you in identifying, addressing and…
-
Business consulting services
Our business consulting services are aimed at addressing concerns in your operations, processes and…
-
Transaction services
Transaction advisory includes all of our services specifically directed at assisting in investment, mergers…
-
Forensic advisory
Our forensic advisory services include assessing your vulnerability to fraud and identifying fraud risk…
-
Cyber advisory
Our focus is to help you identify and manage the cyber risks you might be facing within your…
-
ProActive Hotline
Providing support in preventing and detecting fraud by creating a safe and secure whistleblowing system…
-
Accounting services
At P&A Grant Thornton, we handle accounting services for several companies from a wide range of…
-
Staff augmentation services
We offer Staff Augmentation services where our staff, under the direction and supervision of the company’s…
-
Payroll Processing
Payroll processing services are provided by P&A Grant Thornton Outsourcing Inc. More and more…
-
Our values
Grant Thornton prides itself on being a values-driven organisation and we have more than 38,500 people in…
-
Global culture
Our people tell us that our global culture is one of the biggest attractions of a career with Grant…
-
Learning & development
At Grant Thornton we believe learning and development opportunities allow you to perform…
-
Global talent mobility
One of the biggest attractions of a career with Grant Thornton is the opportunity to work on…
-
Diversity
Diversity helps us meet the demands of a changing world. We value the fact that our people come from all…
-
In the community
Many Grant Thornton member firms provide a range of inspirational and generous services to the…
-
Behind the Numbers: People of P&A Grant Thornton
Discover the inspiring stories of the individuals who make up our vibrant community. From seasoned…
-
Fresh Graduates
Fresh Graduates
-
Students
Whether you are starting your career as a graduate or school leaver, P&A Grant Thornton can give you a…
-
Experienced hires
P&A Grant Thornton offers something you can't find anywhere else. This is the opportunity to develop your…
In our previous articles on transfer pricing, we have already discussed about the functions, assets, and risks (FAR) analysis, entity characterization, and industry analysis. This time, we will talk about the different transfer pricing methodologies.
The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Transfer Pricing Guidelines provide five methodologies that are widely used and accepted by almost all tax authorities in determining transfer prices. These include three traditional transaction methods – comparable uncontrolled price (CUP) method, resale price method (RPM), and cost-plus method (CPM); and two transactional profit methods – transactional net margin method (TNMM) and profit split method (PSM).
These methodologies are adopted by the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR). To better understand these methodologies, we will discuss broadly each of the five TP methods with some sample illustrations.
1. CUP Method
The CUP method compares the price and conditions of products or services in a controlled transaction (i.e., between related parties) with those of an uncontrolled transaction (i.e., between unrelated parties). In applying the CUP method, comparable data between controlled and uncontrolled transactions are required which must be highly similar in order for prices to be considered comparable.
Since this method compares extremely similar products or services, it is considered the most effective and most reliable way in determining arm’s length price for controlled transactions. However, due to the high standards of comparability required in applying CUP method, it is usually a challenge to identify a transaction that’s appropriately comparable to the controlled transaction.
The CUP method can be applied in two ways – the internal CUP and external CUP. Internal CUP is applicable in case the company transacts comparable transactions with related and unrelated parties. On the other hand, external CUP uses comparable data of transactions entered into between two unrelated third parties. Between the two, external CUP is more difficult to apply due to the usual lack of publicly available data on comparable third-party transactions.
Below is an example of how internal CUP method is applied.
“Company A, who is engaged in the lease of commercial spaces, needs to determine how much rental fees it should charge Company B, an affiliate, for the lease of a commercial unit in one of the buildings owned by the former. Let’s say Company A leases some of the commercial spaces in the same building to third party lessees. In applying internal CUP, Company A must ascertain that all lease arrangements made with the third-party lessees are sufficiently comparable with the terms and conditions of the lease to Company B (e.g., leased area, payment terms, liability provisions, etc.) in order for Company A to apply the same rental fees charged to independent third-party lessees to Company B.”
2. RPM
RPM evaluates whether the amount charged in a controlled transaction is at arm's length by reference to the gross margin realized in a comparable uncontrolled transaction. It uses the selling price of a product or service, or the resale price, from which an appropriate gross profit is subtracted from.
The usefulness of this method largely depends on how much added value or alteration the reseller has done on the product before it is resold, or the time that has lapsed between purchase and onward sale. The greater the value added to the properties by the reseller, to the extent that market conditions might have changed before it is resold, the more difficult to use RPM to arrive at the arm’s length price.
Example:
Company C is a distributor of energy drink manufactured by its parent Company in Thailand. The product is being resold by Company C to independent end consumers at P34 per 350ml bottle. Assuming comparable independent distributors earn margins of 5%, the arm’s length transfer price that the parent Company would charge Company C is computed below.
Resale price/Third-party sale price P 34.00
Less: Resale price margin – 5% 1.70
Transfer price P 32.30
3. CPM
Under CPM, the arm’s length price is measured by adding an appropriate gross profit to the overall cost (direct and indirect) of producing the goods or services involved in the controlled transaction. This method calls for a very high level of similarity in the functions being performed by the comparable companies. Therefore, if the comparison is not apples-to-apples, the results will not be reliable. As is the case for all transactional methods, the challenge in using CPM is the availability of comparable data and consistency in the accounting methods.
Here is an example of the application of CPM.
“Company D provides engineering design services to its Japan-based parent company which is engaged in the construction industry. In determining the appropriate markup (gross cost plus) for the services provided to the Japan affiliate, Company D may use the markup applied for its similar comparable transactions with third parties, provided the costs incurred are substantially the same for both services provided. If no comparable third-party transactions of Company D are available, then independent companies engaged in similar activity with Company D can be identified and can apply those comparable companies’ markup to the transactions with the Japan-based related party.”
4. TNMM
Instead of testing and comparing the transfer price, TNMM compares the net margins, relative to an appropriate base such as costs, sales, or assets, attained by an entity from a controlled transaction as against those attained by comparable independent companies involved in similar transactions such that if the level of net margin of the related party is comparable with those independent companies, then the transfer price is carried at arm’s length.
This method is based on the concept that similar firms operating in the same industry would tend to yield similar returns over time. TNMM is the most broadly applicable transfer pricing methodology and commonly used due to its fairly easy implementation which only requires financial data.
Below is the illustration of TNMM.
“Company E is a Philippine subsidiary of a US business process outsourcing (BPO) company. The parent company engages Company E to provide BPO services to parent company’s clients.
To determine how much profit Company E should earn for its BPO operations, comparable companies engaged in the same business activity in the Philippines shall be identified. Using the independent comparable companies’ profit margins before tax, a range of profit margin is computed which can be referred to as arm’s length range of net profit. As such, Company E shall charge service fees to parent company such that Company E would earn the level of net profit within the arm’s length range.”
5. PSM
Affiliated entities normally enter into closely interrelated transactions, so that they cannot be observed independently from each other. This typically is the case when unique intangibles are involved or where multiple controlled transactions happen at the same time.
Normally, the affiliated entities would agree to split the profits. Thus, in profit split method, the operating profits or losses from controlled transactions are allocated in proportion to the relative contributions made by each party in creating the combined profits or losses. The terms and conditions of interconnected related party transactions are evaluated to determine how profits would be divided in case similar transactions are entered into between unrelated parties.
Below is an example of the application of profit split method.
“Company F is an Australia-based intangible holding company that provides patents to a related manufacturing Company G in Malaysia. Company G sells its entire production to a related marketing company H. Assuming there are no significant marketing intangibles (trademarks, etc.), the determination of arm’s length price for royalties to be charged by Company F to Company G would be as follows:
- Determine the optimum profits that should be earned by Company G on the basis of the profits of comparable companies (i.e., engaged in manufacturing)
- Determine the optimum profits that should be earned by Company H on the basis of the profits of comparable companies (i.e., engaged in marketing)
- Aggregate the entire actual profits of the group (F, G, and H).
- From such aggregate profits, the optimum profits attributable to activities of Company G and H as determined in the previous steps are deducted.
- The balance profits would be the value of intangibles held by F and would indicate the optimum level of royalty to be paid by G.
Takeaway
The Philippine transfer pricing rules do not make any preference on any particular methodology. The tax authority only requires that the method used shall provide the most reliable measure of an arm’s length result. It is, therefore, crucial in preparing transfer pricing documentation that taxpayers are well informed of the different methodologies and on how and when they are applicable in order to arrive at justifiable transfer prices that comply with the arm’s length principle.
Stay tuned for our next month’s article as we continue to take you through the other components of transfer pricing documentation.
Let's Talk TP is an offshoot of Let’s Talk Tax, a weekly newspaper column of P&A Grant Thornton that aims to keep the public informed of various developments in taxation. This article is not intended to be a substitute for competent professional advice.
As published in BusinessWorld, dated 29 November 2022